Sunday, August 28, 2016

What's Wrong with the 2016 Movies?

No matter how much "fun" I had in the hot summer of 2016 with my loving family, the same can't be said for these blockbuster movies that had such promise. Why is it that the only films, besides Captain America: Civil War, Finding DoryThe Secret Life of Pets and Suicide Squad, that were very successful are mostly in the spring (Deadpool, Zootopia, Jungle Book)? What has happened to those that unfortunately didn't bring much excitement like they have before? Is it the poor marketing? Or is it the vaguely tiring storylines in franchises that either overstayed their welcome or they were not supposed to be from the very beginning? Right now, the only films that I'm glad/ok with that they lost money at the box office are the entirely unnecessary Ice Age: Collision Course and the Ben-Hur remake, as well as the expected-to-flop Gods of Egypt and the critically-divisive all-female Ghostbusters reboot. For Universal/Legendary/Blizzard Entertainment's Warcraft, I had a feeling that it wouldn't be a huge hit, except in international states like China, given its lack of box office draws and my unfamiliarity with the World of Warcraft video game concept. Here are the 2016 movies (some of which I enjoyed or thought I did enjoy, or never seen but heard of) that I didn't expect them to end up as critically and/or financially disappointing flops that could trigger possible consequences:



Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows
RT: 38% / CinemaScore: A-
Budget: $135 million
Current Box Office Run: $242.5 million ($82 million in U.S.)
Predecessor: TMNT (2014) (Worldwide: $493.3 million/U.S.: $191.2 million; RT: 22%, CinemaScore: B)



The Divergent Series: Allegiant
RT: 13% / CinemaScore: B
Budget: $110 million
Current Box Office Run: $179.2 million ($66.2 million in U.S.)
Predecessor: Divergent (Worldwide: $288.9 million/U.S.: $150.9 million; RT: 41%, CinemaScore: A) & Insurgent (Worldwide: $297.3 million/U.S.: $130.2 million; RT: 28%, CinemaScore: A-)



The Nice Guys
RT: 91% / CinemaScore: B-
Budget: $50 million
Current Box Office Run: $36.3 million (U.S. only)
Predecessor: n/a



Kubo and the Two Strings
RT: 96% / CinemaScore: A
Budget: $60 million
Current Box Office Run: $27.6 million ($24.9 million in U.S.)
Predecessor: n/a



13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi
RT: 50% / CinemaScore: A
Budget: $50 million
Current Box Office Run: $69.4 million ($52.9 million in U.S.)
Predecessor: n/a



X-Men: Apocalypse
RT: 48% / CinemaScore: A-
Budget: $178 million
Current Box Office Run: $541.1 million ($155.4 million in U.S.)
Predecessor: X-Men (Worldwide: $296.3 million/U.S.: $157.3 million; RT: 81%, CinemaScore: A-), X2 (Worldwide: $407.7 million/U.S.: $214.9 million; RT: 86%, CinemaScore: A), X-Men: The Last Stand (Worldwide: $459.4 million/U.S.: $234.4 million; RT: 58%, CinemaScore: A-), X-Men: First Class (Worldwide: $353.6 million/U.S.: $146.4 million; RT: 86%, CinemaScore: B+), & X-Men: Days of Future Past (Worldwide: $747.9 million/U.S.: $233.9 million; RT: 91%, CinemaScore: A)



Star Trek Beyond
RT: 83% / CinemaScore: A-
Budget: $185 million
Current Box Office Run: $243 million ($151 million in U.S.)
Predecessor: Star Trek (Worldwide: $385.7 million/U.S.: $257.7 million; RT: 95%, CinemaScore: A) & Star Trek Into Darkness (Worldwide: $467.4 million/U.S.: $228.8 million; RT: 86%, CinemaScore: A)



Alice Through the Looking Glass
RT: 30% / CinemaScore: A-
Budget: $170 million
Current Box Office Run: $294.5 million ($77 million in U.S.)
Predecessor: Alice in Wonderland (2010) (Worldwide: $1.025 billion/U.S.: $334.2 million; RT: 52%, CinemaScore: A-)



Independence Day: Resurgence
RT: 32% / CinemaScore: B
Budget: $165 million
Current Box Office Run: $382.4 million ($102.9 million in U.S.)
Predecessor: Independence Day (Worldwide: $817.4 million/U.S.: $306.2 million; RT: 61%, CinemaScore: A)

Oh, what the heck. I think I'm glad that it didn't do well at the box office! Maybe Roland Emmerich should not have thought about making a sequel (or two) to Independence Day 20 years ago! At least Star Wars: The Force Awakens and Jurassic World paid better respect to their long-time predecessors!




So in conclusion, I believe that this year would have probably gotten better movies if neither of them were sequels or remakes to movies that nobody's crazy about or are vastly underrated films that have intriguing originally-conceived concepts yet aren't heavily-marketed enough, based on these disappointing financial figures. Can't believe that this summer, while could have been more fun than last year, is coming to an end. But I hope that my new Fall Semester classes at George Mason will bring back the fun and happiness that I always had!

Monday, August 15, 2016

My Favorite Movies of Summer 2016


My Top 10 favorite movies of Summer 2016:

1. Captain America: Civil War - 91% (CinemaScore: A)
2. Finding Dory - 94% (CinemaScore: A)
3. Suicide Squad - 27% (CinemaScore: B+)
4. X-Men: Apocalypse - 48% (CinemaScore: A-)
5. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows - 36% (CinemaScore: A-)
6. The Angry Birds Movie - 44% (CinemaScore: B+)
7. The Secret Life of Pets - 74% (CinemaScore: A-)
8. Star Trek Beyond - 85% (CinemaScore: A-)
9. Jason Bourne - 54% (CinemaScore: A-)
10. Ghostbusters - 74% (CinemaScore: B+)




Note: These percentages indicate how positive the critical reviews are, according to rottentomatoes.com. To learn more about CinemaScore, enter http://www.cinemascore.com/.

Monday, August 8, 2016

Quick Review of 'Suicide Squad'


You know what? Forget what everybody thinks. I think Suicide Squad is actually quite entertaining, better than Batman v Superman! When I looked at the 26% Rotten Tomatoes rating and the reviews stating that this suffered too much editing problems or a "muddled plot", I almost feared that it was gonna be like Green Lantern/Fant4stic-bad as one review would state. But when I finally got to see it last night with my sister, almost everything in that film actually got me quite satisfied even with some things that Warner Bros. and DC still needs to absolutely work on. So there we have in a world where Superman died from the Doomsday battle, and the government including the big boss of "Task Force X" herself Amanda Waller (better than the utterly-wasted Angela Bassett in the Ryan Reynolds GL film) are considering the alternatives of who they should use to defend the world from any possible off-world threat since the events of the first two DCEU starters. And that's when the Suicide Squad was born when some ancient supernatural force like the oh-so-sexy-but-weird-looking Enchantress threatens to bring total annihilation upon our world. The supervillains introduced in the Squad, minus Slipknot, have some brilliant chemistry amongst each other and are actually more fleshed out than ever instead of us seeing them as cheap evil villains. At least that it doesn't always take itself way too seriously when there's some parts where the added humor is necessary instead of awkwardly forced like the Iron Man sequels or Thor 2. The songs included made it look like it's Guardians of the Galaxy, except in a more twisted way when it comes to a supervillain-only movie. Deadshot, Harley Quinn, El Diablo, and Killer Croc are the biggest standouts of the Suicide Squad movie! But my favorite out of all of them are of course Harley Quinn, because Margot Robbie - she's hot and really acted like she had fun playing the character who dearly loves the Joker (A.K.A. Mr. J or "Puddin'") so much! I'm not even sure who's the hottest babe in this film? Her, the Enchantress, or the sword-wielding Japanese newbie Katana? Sometimes, I feel like I can't help but think to myself that the Enchantress (Cara Delvingne) is extremely hot due to her seductive bare-nakedness! And I believe that Will Smith really pulled off his Deadshot character, delivering some entertaining one-liners and having a tragic backstory of him trying to be with his daughter before getting arrested for the murders he committed as a hired hitman. He probably should have signed up and starred in the Independence Day sequel. But by the end of the movie as the Suicide Squad faces off with the Enchantress, things got a little interesting when El Diablo unleashes his true power by enlarging himself into some giant behemoth on fire! What really works and saved most of Suicide Squad from suffering from the studio-meddling problems was probably the music score composed by Academy Award-winner of Gravity Steven Price. For example, the part when Deadshot was about to fire his gun at the explosives to destroy Enchantress while conflicted by his daughter begging him not to pull the trigger and turn into the man she might be scared of. How emotional can you be? If they didn't hype up some stuff like the presence of Jared Leto's Joker, then this movie would have actually gotten some decent reviews instead of bad ones that make it out like it was a movie not worth seeing which I don't believe. But I would definitely kill (figure of speech) for some extended scenes that will really develop some stuff that should have been anything but cheap exposition like Harleen Quinzel's transformation into Harley Quinn. But at least we have the Batman: TAS "Mad Love" episode to better understand the Joker/Harley Quinn relationship. Heck, I would be happy to see what scenes, originally seen in trailers and TV spots, that have the Joker were cut out just to make us care about the Jared Leto version! I'm glad that the Batman we see in Suicide Squad is none other than Ben Affleck, who eventually tells Amanda Waller in the mid-credits scene to cease her Task Force X activities to let the Justice League handle the situations. Oh, and did I forget to mention about the Ezra Miller Flash cameo in the Capt. Boomerang flashback? Let's pray that the hiring of Geoff Johns & Jon Berg post-BvS/SS will mean that the DC Extended Universe will be just as good as the now-too-formulaic Marvel Cinematic Universe. Cue the Bohemian Rhapsody/Ballroom Blitz/Sucker for Pain, etc. song, evildoers! Glad that I'm not as underwhelmed as my first viewing of the theatrical version of BvS! I just think this summer could have been better if only it wasn't so full of financially-disappointing and critically-reviled films.

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

My Delta Alpha Pi Honor Society T-Shirt Design


Since I have been writing too many blog posts about movies, I thought I would like to share this to prove how much of a brilliant graphic designer I am since attending George Mason 2 years ago. I am currently enrolled in the Delta Alpha Pi Honor Society, which consists of people with disabilities such as autism and hearing impairments. There is a t-shirt design contest that will go on until next August, the start of Fall Semester. I thought it would be most respectful if I could design one of my own since I am a DAPi member.
The design I had made for one of the t-shirts prior to submission for voting, it's a set of words spelling out "Delta Alpha Pi Honor Society," positioned to the right in a staircase-like manner, as a way to symbolize the message that when you take one step at a time, you are on a path to success when accomplishing your desired goal. The typeface for these DAPi letters are in a Charter format, and "George Mason University" (capitalized to express its strong contribution to the honor society) and "Honor Society" are both PT Sans typefaces for simpler and cheap uses. I applied them with dark green, dark blue, and mild yellow colors. In addition to that, I created several black lines with the square tool before carefully aligning them with the "Delta", "Alpha", "Pi", and "Honor Society" evenly as though they are the steps that form a staircase. I've increased the size of D, A, and P letters to slightly bigger to display like some kind of an acronym, while living the other letters to each the first capitalized letters all lowercase with some kerning and leading altered to provide tiny gaps and eliminating any sign of tightness among the letters.

So there you have it. My very own DAPi t-shirt design, not having any logos already used which is copyright-protected. It's better than just applying the official DAPi logo that would have been a challenge for me since I can't change any details that are already perfect as it is. My design may not end up as the winning one, but at least it'll be respectfully nominated by the deciding voters of the t-shirt design contest, whether or not that will happen. Got to be prepared for the next (and penultimate) semester at George Mason University, even if I was just having such a relaxing summer break!

Quick Review of 'Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice' (ULTIMATE EDITION)


Where do I begin? Oh, yes. Despite its first theatrical release 4 months ago, I did not make a quick review on this blog because 1) I have no comment to say about it given our underwhelming reactions to what we thought would be a Batman/Superman movie worth waiting, and 2) there is a 3-hour long, R-rated extended cut that I know is what the BvS experience should have been like while still retaining stuff that most people find uncomfortable. I made a Facebook note that jots down a lot of details that I believe that Zack Snyder (I named him one of  the "worst directors of all time" next to M. Night Shyamalan!) and the guys involved could have avoided without repeating the same upsetting mistakes from Man of Steel. It felt like as though I might have made a mistake being excited to see Batman v Superman even though Captain America: Civil War is what I'm waiting to see this year. Watching the first trailer of that last year and then another set of them prior to its first debut reminded me how much that promising blockbuster event could have turned out if they didn't have a lot of things that could spell, how do I put this? MAJOR LETDOWN! No matter the spectacular action and visual sets, especially Ben Affleck's Dark Knight Returns-inspired (yet murderous in a controversial way to fans and critics) take on the eponymous Bat Vigilante, it's sad to see that everything gets to be majorly criticized because Warner Bros. and DC thinks that it's "good" to make it all dark and gritty in an out-of-character way. Especially when they absolutely mishandled Superman's iconic bald-headed archenemy that deserves better in the live-action movies. Just like Superman who's had way too many mediocre movie adaptations after the first two critically-acclaimed Richard Donner films. Perhaps the studio should know that Superman was never supposed to be in the same league as Batman just by acting so full of misery because Snyder thinks it's necessary to make his actions, heroic or not, relate to our real-life events when that's not how the Superman concept works. But when I looked at the initial reactions to the Ultimate Edition (which came out on Digital HD June 28th and on Blu-ray/DVD July 19th, which I finally bought this week), they were instead generally positive which gave me some enlightenment that perhaps the DC Extended Universe might not be such a terrible idea after all after suffering from such a debacle that almost killed off any chance of that happening like it did to Sony's Spider-Man Cinematic Universe. So, I decided to give myself to see if the Ultimate Edition will justify everything that Batman v Superman has most people were extremely uncomfortable with, even if it whether or not alter the overall movie experience and initial criticisms (already rated 27% on Rotten Tomatoes, 6.9/10 on IMDb, and granted a CinemaScore grade of B) for diehard fans in the similar vein of the superior director's cuts of Daredevil and Kingdom of Heaven. I mean, they're the ones who praised Ben Affleck's first time playing Batman despite being undeservedly hated for his murderous actions.
When I first saw the movie at home last week on Saturday night, I think it was much better than my first viewing at a theater. The Ultimate Edition does make the plot more coherent, if only they didn't really hype the long-anticipated fight which only lasts like a few minutes. I mean everybody despised the part where Batman stopped killing Superman because he uttered the name "Martha", both shared by their respective mothers, yet we all should know that it is because he finally saw the humanity in Superman, and comparing him to how his father also said his wife's name before dying, which is why he frustratingly threw away the Kryptonite spear as though he was becoming the man who murdered his parents. What hasn't changed however, is the awfully cringy to painful lines uttered by Jesse Eisenberg's so-called Lex Luthor (said to be the "son of the ACTUAL Lex Luthor", who we could have had, but no!), no matter how better improved is his plot to motivate both of DC's most popular heroes into fighting each other in this new cut (explained by extra stuff like Clark Kent's Batman investigation, the death of a branded criminal plotted by Luthor's thugs, and the suicide bomber's wheelchair being lined with lead making it immune to Supes' x-ray vision). And even if everybody likes this more than the studio-based theatrical cut, what's to stop them from criticizing the final act with the even more destructive battle between the Trinity (Superman, Batman, and WONDER WOMAN!) and Doomsday (cloned from General Zod's dead body) when it was said to be too much of a last-minute addition to an awfully-crowded plot that WB and DC were clearly struggling with if they're willing to compete with the Marvel Cinematic Universe? And yes, it did feel like it's too soon to (SPOILER) kill off Superman when bringing in the Doomsday monster when he just starred in the DCEU a movie ago. But without that, then Bruce and Diana would not have been inspired to build up a Justice League by finding the Flash, Aquaman, and Cyborg (no matter how "cheap" their teaser via email was handled). And Bruce wouldn't even have to consider going back to his 20-year-old no-killing rule hence why he instead spared Lex Luthor from viciously branding him in prison.
This major crisis wouldn't have happened if Zack Snyder and David S. Goyer only knew that perhaps not every DC hero needs to be like Batman because dark and gritty does not always equal success. If they wanted to portray our favorite superheroes without making them as cold-hearted murderers, they could have at least watch the better-written and definitive DC Animated shows like Superman: The Animated Series and Justice League Unlimited than just looking at comic book pages and then not bother reading their entire stories of how noble and heroic they need to be. And if they wanted Batman v Superman to earn $1 billion before earning just $872 million, they would have like taken their time reading and approving what works or doesn't work in the script, despite being rewritten by some Oscar-winner like Chris Terrio. If I can guess one major reason why critics are dissing them, is this: too much destruction. Maybe Zack Snyder could at least tone it down a little and make the preserving people's lives a major concern and priority for heroes to worry about no matter how overpowered most superpowered beings can be. It could be the reason why Captain America: Civil War was instead better received and actually did earn over $1 billion. At least the plot and the reason that our favorite heroes are against each other were so easy to follow without finding them extremely convoluted like BvS's. Guess Marvel is "better than DC", in terms of live-action movies, no matter how "forced" the humor was that many people would find such a big deal to complain about instead.
But the point is, I actually liked the Ultimate Edition of BvS. Definitely on par with the excellent extended cuts of say the Lord of the Rings trilogy and the underrated albeit overlong Watchmen. I totally recommend that to people who might have been upset with the outcome of the final cut at a movie theater that the studio lazily favored over Snyder's. The best thing about that, regardless if they were hated for no reason, was the fact that at least Ben Affleck's Batman is more terrifying and a truly excellent fighter unlike the previous Batmen in the outdated films, which is what fans absolutely want, correct? Although they really need to work on making Henry Cavill's Superman more likable and not so easy to hate (since Superman IV and Superman Returns) for being so mopey even in a situation where he was feared by many people around the world for being an outcast alien before he was eventually seen as a martyr after death. They also need to better clarify questionable and stupid plot holes like Lois throwing away the Kryptonite spear into the water abyss only to retrieve it again later on and nearly drowning herself during the Doomsday fight. And having seen the Comic-Con trailer of... JUSTICE LEAGUE! It looks to be that the promotion of Geoff Johns and Jon Berg as head of the DC Films Division has paid off! And with the enthusiastically positive buzz of next month's Suicide Squad, it looks like that the newly-built cinematic universe of the DC superheroes are starting to look toward a brighter future!




Monday, July 18, 2016

Quick Review of 2016's 'Ghostbusters'


Who you're gonna call? Someone else. By "someone else," I mean female stars like Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, Kate McKinnon, and Leslie Jones. Four months ago, I watched the first trailer of this feminine reboot version of the once-popular 1980s Ghostbusters. Every review I read, which were mostly negative on YouTube regarding the sexist topic, and view these hilarious yet stupidly corny jokes, I thought it was gonna be like one of those horrible remakes and reboots (Amazing Spider-Man, Terminator Genisys, Total Recall) made by Hollywood nowadays that nearly stained classic ones. Especially when I called Sony the worst movie studio of all time due to the lack of well-marketed and highly-appealing movies, its over reliance on product placement, and its greedy obsession of making unwanted by-the-number remakes like Annie and next year's Jumanji. I even called this year's GB as one of my worst movies of all time prior to theatrical release. But when Rotten Tomatoes gave it a 73% rating (though audience score is right now 57%) by saying that it was "great", I was confused. What about when the Internet Movie Database gave it a 4.0+/10 rating? Surely, they were exactly what the YouTube reviews have been saying. I said to myself that I would pass on the new GB movie no matter how much Sony keeps promoting it. I've just seen my 1984 Ghostbusters DVD twice as an absolute reminder that it will always be what many people remember the Ghostbusters as. However, during our brief stay in Indiana by visiting Auntie Lily's house last weekend, my sister Christine goaded me into seeing it with her despite my concerns about the negativity being true. I guess that she was trying to let me give it a chance because of what I've been saying to her about how the female Ghostbusters movie is not as bad as the comments on YouTube have been saying.
In my first viewing of it, I was aware that while the jokes given that it is a Paul Feig movie may turn out to be worth laughing out loud at, not every one of them should be taken too seriously. Everything does remind me so much of what I remember Ghostbusters to be like, at least not in a disrespectful way since it is after all a reboot from scratch with no connection with the first two original films. Kristen Wiig, as Erin Gilbert, is one of the female comedy stars I like for playing such a nice woman with an excellent sense of humor because look, she reminds me so much of the lovable Lucy Wilde from Despicable Me 2! She acted like she's having fun interacting with someone like Melissa McCarthy, as Erin's Ray Stanz-like friend Abby Yates. And remember when I thought that Leslie Jones, as Patty Jones, would be so irritatingly annoying because of her stereotypical black woman characteristics? Actually, she doesn't seem so bad, because she actually does make me laugh so hard when she says things like "I don't know if it's a race thing or a lady thing, but I'm mad as hell!" and "The power of Patty compels you!" But the biggest standout of the lady quartet is Kate McKinnon, as Jillian Holtzmann! I think she is the most eccentric and the most likable female Ghostbuster of them all! Love the way she acted like such a goofball while being a brilliant engineer and provider of the ghost-capturing weapons. Especially how she took down all of Rowan's evil ghosts LIKE A BOSS ("You just got Holtzmann'ed!")! The other stars I find okay or mediocre are the hunky yet wasteful Chris Hemsworth (Kevin) and the one-dimensional Neil Casey (GB 2016 main villain Rowan). There are also some fun albeit cheap cameos from the original Ghostbusters, now mind you they are actually characters DIFFERENT from the characters we know and love, like Bill Murray, Annie Potts, Dan Aykroyd, Sigourney Weaver, and of course Ernie Hudson!
Overall, it was actually a fun remake of Sony's horror-comedy blockbuster property even while suffering from the usual remake-is-inferior problems and the so-bad-yet-it's-ridiculously-funny-if-not-completely-forced jokes! It didn't actually end up a franchise-killing abomination like Batman & Robin or Fant4stic! And neither is it one of the turned-out-to-be-awful-in-my-opinion movies that strangely earned good Rotten Tomato ratings (Noah - 76%, Indiana Jones 4 - 77%, Superman Returns - 76%, Piranha 3D - 73%, etc.)! Perhaps it wasn't much of a waste of a ticket even if there are other summer movies better than this what is now one of my favorite guilty pleasure movies right up with Angry Birds, Pixels, Battleship, and the Transformers movies! Let's see if its $46 million opening will allow Sony to begin this ever-expanding cinematic universe of the Ghostbusters (having their own production company called "Ghost Corps") they've been planning after their Spider-Man Cinematic Universe was killed by The UN-Amazing Spider-Man 2! So who are you gonna call?



GHOSTBUSTERS (either male (old) or female (new))!!!

Monday, June 27, 2016

Regretful Throwback Review of 'Transformers: Age of Extinction'


I thought it would be nice for me to write this regretful throwback review of 2014's Transformers: Age of Extinction since today is June 27th. "Best Summer Movie of 2014"? "Better than TF 2 & 3"? What the heck was I thinking? Was the wait for TF4 worth it after Michael Bay finished Pain & Gain? As I compare and contrast this fourquel with the first three films that I remember were the real deal, it grieves me to say how disappointed I was. For a minute, I thought that TF4 would help me put aside all of the overwhelmingly upsetting complaints and flaws (such as cheap fan service of 'bots and 'cons) that I've had to go through in Revenge of the Fallen (my most disliked TF sequel since 2009) and Dark of the Moon, both of which I believe were not on par with the first ever live-action Transformers movie that changed my life forever. Once I knew that Shia LaBeouf's character is not set to appear in the 4th film, I thought that it would be a relief. From my first viewing of TF: AOE at Tysons Corner, I was sort of glad that most of the robot characters like Optimus Prime felt like actual characters than cheap visual props. With the addition of the Dinobots and Galvatron being revealed to be the same Megatron from TF 1-3, I thought that things were about to get very interesting for the movie franchise. But it's as though the weak domestic gross of $245 million, the meager $60 million DVD/Blu-ray sales, and the Rotten Tomato critical rating of 18% that AOE got were right all along. As do the mediocre-detailed TF movie toy figures (and lack of correct-sized toys regarding Lockdown and Galvatron) nowadays. For every repeated viewing before looking back at the original 3, I realized that my initial appreciation of TF4 was a big mistake. Which leaves me a question: Is the latest movie that stars Mark Wahlberg the post-DOTM epilogue I have been waiting for after finishing the final season of Transformers: Prime? Problem was, Age of Extinction lacked everything that I enjoyed about the Transformers movies, terrible or no, before the movie industry became dominated by even better ones like Marvel/DC superhero movies, Hunger Games and such. The outcome of the Chicago Battle we got instead are humans fearing and hating the Transformers, especially the Autobots that have fought everything by sacrificing their own home planet to save mankind from the Decepticons, which prompted the government to finally cut off military ties with the Autobots and thus allowing the hostile human task force Cemetery Wind to hunt down Decepticons AND Autobots across the globe! What happens to the post-DOTM Autobots (anyone NOT Optimus Prime or Bumblebee) minus newcomers like Hound, Drift, and Crosshairs? They were said to have been massacred. Every. Last One. Which may include Ratchet (check), Leadfoot (check), Roadbuster, Topspin, Dino/Mirage (Mattel, not Hasbro, owns Ferrari - so, he must be dead), and even Sideswipe. Not the personal "thank you" I wanted for the Autobots that may not participate in AOE. It just makes me feel so upset and angry that the Transformers brand is losing everything that made it so popular as if cheaply killing off Starscream, Soundwave, and Shockwave in TF3 wasn't bad enough! Seeing Ratchet, the last of the original TF1 cast, getting gunned down by Savoy's team and Lockdown was like seeing part of my childhood being destroyed! They should have let Josh Duhamel and Tyrese Gibson come back to play Lennox and Epps again to provide some indication that the TF1-3 feeling is not gone for good and that there are still humans remaining loyal with the Autobots. It's almost like Dark of the Moon, although containing stuff that upsets me the most like Sentinel Prime's allegiance with the Decepticons and his role being a main TF3 villain instead of Megatron or Shockwave, could have been the final film despite the ending that I felt needed some extension to properly tie up loose ends. Even with the new human cast, they're just even more unlikeable and even worse than they were before like the movie crew and writer Ehren Kruger were either on drugs or completely desperate to make the movie per the studio's request without being concerned about the fans' complaints! And once we were given an explanation that there were "Creators" that uses their "Seeds" to produce and harvest the metal "Transformium" from every organic material they destroy to build the Transformers, as well as the mention of "Knights" (albeit poorly-developed like it was an afterthought) given by Lockdown, that's where it becomes such a jumbled mess that we're unable to clean up. I was more used to the whole AllSpark/Sun Harvester/Moon history thing that I thought for sure that that was it in order to tie all 3 films together. But with the Creator-Seed-Knight issue, I'm not so sure if they do tie well with them. Plus, Optimus and Hound acted like they know so much about that even though Optimus doesn't know who these Creators are and how those Seeds work! I would have to assume that Lockdown might have told him off-screen while Tessa escapes from the drones! And does the AllSpark cube matter to that new plot detail in AOE that wasn't thought of to begin with, or does it not anymore when they say that TF4 is a "soft reboot" despite having an obvious connection with the Chicago Battle in the predecessor? Not only was Transformers 4 so entirely convoluted, but it was so full of very forced humor and unlikeable & unnecessary humans like Jack Reynor and Sophia Myles, and said to be too much of a product placement commercial as though it was for the sake of raising business in China hence why AOE was strongly successful internationally than in the U.S. As soon as we're introduced to Creators, Cemetery Wind, KSI (pointless as it is due to the uninspiring "transforming" sequences), Lockdown, and Galvatron's one-dimensional subplot of him leading his army to capture the Seed, there was just TOO MUCH GOING ON given the 2 hour 45 minute run time! I think I'm good with just the AllSpark origin. It's that simple! Why bother saying that the Creators were responsible for the birth of the Transformers 3 movies later? It was so much better when it was just Autobots vs. Decepticons. THAT is what the Transformers movies after 3 should have been about! Perhaps it was a bad decision to kill off our favorite Decepticons so soon which kinda explains the point with the KSI-made prototype robots. Are these guys out of ideas no matter how much amount of money they get from each film? This is why the first Transformers movie to me is the best one compared to the inferior sequels, like what Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl is to the 3-4 sequels. If next summer's Transformers: The Last Knight does not breathe some life back into this 5-time Razzie Award-winning, critically-struggling 4-film franchise that grossed over $3.7 billion worldwide, then they are about to meet the same fate as the other shameful movie franchises (Resident Evil, Terminator, Ice Age, etc.) that have overstayed their welcome! Guess as Brains would put it, "You dumb greedy bastards just brought extinction to yourself." Paramount had better let Michael Bay be true to his word that The Last Knight would be the "last Transformers movie" he would ever direct to make fans very happy! Right now, the best place where I will truly appreciate the Transformers is not just in the 1st Michael Bay TF movie, but in the G1/Prime TV shows and the War for/Fall of Cybertron video games.
However, with the return of Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson and Megatron (not as Galvatron?) in TF5: TLK, it seems that my faith in the TF movies would have to remain intact before I jumped to conclusions too quickly about reminding myself that "the TF sequels always ruin everything." To remain positive rather than worry myself no matter how many awful comments I find in each movie update, I would watch the final TF4 scene of Optimus leaving Earth to find the Creators a couple times to make me feel anticipated for the 5th installment of the "Transformers Cinematic Universe". Even if, at the same time, I feel nervous about the franchise fatigue getting much worse since Amazing Spider-Man 2 and Terminator Genisys. Let's hope that the oh-so brilliant Writers' Room are successfully getting the Transformers movie franchise back on track with these "wonderful ideas" that they'll come up with for spin-offs (Bumblebee) and prequels (Cybertron).


I'm coming for you.